NOSTRADAMUS · Position Analytics Engine

SIMULATOR Will Hunter Biden win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?

A live, interactive instrument for dissecting a single binary position. Sweep the inputs and watch every indicator recompute — payoff geometry, Kelly growth, Bayesian posterior, KL divergence, cost waterfall, Monte-Carlo equity fan, forecast calibration. Companion to the live /feed/pm-will-person-a-win-the-2028-democratic-presidential-nomination page.

▲ YES EDGE · +0.054 · f★ 5.5% · deploy 2.7% · net 4.61pp

§1 · Position economics

Payoff diagram · binary contract P/L vs resolution
YES · Expected P/L per share +0.0536@ model P(YES) = 0.071
-1.00-0.50+0.00+0.50+1.000.000.200.400.600.801.00price 0.018model 0.071YES resolution priceP/L per $1 contract
P/L per sharemarket pricemodel Pprofit zoneloss zone
Profit is linear in the eventual settlement price.
Kelly growth curve · g(f) with f★ and deployed f markers
f★ = 5.46% · g(f★) = 4.760%deploy 2.73% · g = 4.037%
-16.28%-10.84%-5.40%0.04%5.47%0%8%16%24%32%40%f★ optimumdeployfraction of bankroll fexpected log-growth g(f)
g(f)f★ optimumdeployed fgrowth zone
Underbet leaves growth on the table; overbet destroys capital. The interior maximum is f★.

§2 · The trade ticket

Trade ticket · dollar outcomes at this stake
YES @ 0.018 · EV +$2,090stake $682 · 2.73% of bankroll
Deployed stakestake
$682
2.73% of bankroll
Sharesunits
38,984
each pays $1 if YES
Max payoutwin
$38,984
gross, if win
Max profitwin
+$38,301
net of cost
Max losslose
-$682
binary settles to $0
Payout multiple×
×57.14
$1 → $57.14
Risk:RewardR:R
56.14 : 1
win $56.14 per $1
Expected P/LE[P/L]
+$2,090
probability-weighted
OutcomeP(model)P/LContribution
Resolves YES (win)7.1%+$38,301+$2,724
Resolves against (lose)92.9%-$682-$634
Expected value100.0%+$2,090
What you actually win and lose. The bottom table tabulates probability-weighted P/L by outcome.

§3 · Break-even & cushion

Break-even & cushion · margin of safety
Cushion +5.4 pprelative edge +306.4%
Required win ratebreak-even
1.8%
price = implied probability
Model win rateP(win)
7.1%
what you forecast
Cushionedge
+5.4 pp
margin of safety
Fair pricemodel
0.071
where you think it should trade
-60-3003060020406080100you @ 1.8%market price (%)cushion (pp)
The market price equals the win rate you must beat to make money.

§4 · Odds conversion

Implied probability, decimal, American, fractional
Implied probabilityP
1.8%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
57.143
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+5614
$100 wins $5614
FractionalUK
56.14 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$5614.29
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 1.8%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Five views of the same number.

§4b · Time & annualized return

Time & APR · capital lockup vs annualized return
APR 5326% · APY 3840546667821%ROI 306.4% over 21d · 17.4 turns/yr
Time to resolvehorizon
21.0 d
504h capital lockup
Raw ROIper resolve
+306.4%
APR (simple)scaled
+5326%
ROI × 365/days
APY (compounded)if redeployed
+3840546667821%
(1+ROI)^(365/d) − 1
Daily expectedper day
+6.91%
geometric, per day held
Capital turns/yrvelocity
×17.4
how often this slot recycles
0%844920266921%1689840533841%2534760800762%3379681067682%4224601334603%121416180100120now 21ddays to resolutionannualized return (capped 1000%)
simple APRcompounded APYyour horizon
Rank positions by APR, not raw ROI. A thin edge tomorrow beats a fat edge next year.

§5 · Costs & net edge

Cost waterfall · gross edge → net of friction
Net edge +4.61 pperosion 14% · break-even w/ fees 2.5%
-0.1pp1.3pp2.7pp4.0pp5.4pp6.8pp+5.36Gross edge-0.75- ½ spread+0.00- entry fee+0.00- exit fee+4.61Net edgeEV / share (pp)
gross edgefrictionnet edgefee 0 bps · spread 1.50¢
The number that decides whether to trade.

§6 · Sizing menu

Sizing menu · disciplined deployment
Full Kellyf★
$1,364
5.46% · g = 4.760%
Half Kelly½ f★
$682
2.73% · g = 4.037%
Quarter Kelly¼ f★
$341
1.36% · g = 2.769%
Flat 1%1%
$250
1.00% · g = 2.236%
Flat 2%2%
$500
2.00% · g = 3.477%
Flat 5%5%
$1,250
5.00% · g = 4.744%
Recommended¼ f★
$341
survives model error
$0$403$805$1,208$1,610$1,364Full Kelly5.46%$682Half Kelly2.73%$341Quarter Kelly1.36%$250Flat 1%1.00%$500Flat 2%2.00%$1,250Flat 5%5.00%
Quarter-Kelly is the industry default — survives model error far better than full Kelly.

§7 · Information theory

Binary entropy · uncertainty in bits
Market entropyH(p)
0.127 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.370 bit
Δ +0.243 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
5.84 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.03 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
H(p) peaks at p = 0.5 (one bit of irreducible doubt).
KL divergence · upper bound on exploitable edge
SIGNAL · D_KL(q ‖ p) = 0.0476 nat (0.0687 bit)exploitable edge present
-0.064-0.0150.0330.0810.1300.0997YES branch-0.0521NO branchΣKL = 0.0476 natKL contribution (nat)
YES contributionNO contributionbelief ‖ marketsignal
Zero KL ⇒ you know nothing the crowd doesn't.

§8 · Bayesian inference

Bayesian posterior · prior + evidence → belief with 95% CI
MARKET PRICE INSIDE 95% CIposterior μ 0.071 · CI [0.00, 0.23] · κ 17.4
Posterior meanE[θ]
0.071
Beta(1.2, 16.1)
95% credible intervalHDI
[0.00, 0.23]
price INSIDE → weak edge
Concentrationκ
17.4
pseudo-obs behind belief
Disagreementvs crowd
+5.1 pp
posterior − price
0.000.200.400.600.801.00marketposterior μprobability θposterior density
market prior (dashed)model posterior95% credible bandmarket price
When the market price falls outside the 95% credible interval, your disagreement is statistically meaningful.

§9 · Tail risk · Monte-Carlo (mode A · single position to resolution)

Mark-to-market MC · single position held to resolution
E[P/L] +300.0% · P(YES) 7.0% · VaR₉₅ 100.0%400 paths · 504 bars to resolution
Expected P/Lper $1
+300.00%
P(YES) empiricalq
7.0%
Best pathmax
+5614.3%
Worst pathmin
-100.0%
VaR 95%5%
100.0%
CVaR 95%ES
100.0%
25¢50¢75¢100¢084168252336420504entry 1.8¢model q 7.1¢bars until resolutionprice path
median path25/75 + 5/95 bandsentry pricemodel q
Logit-space mean-reverting walk + terminal flip with probability q. Answers: 'what happens to THIS one position'. Distinct from the repeated-edge fan below.

§9b · Tail risk · Monte-Carlo (mode B · repeated independent edges)

Monte-Carlo equity fan · this profile, repeated 400× independently
Median CAGR/bet 4.51% · ruin rate 17.8%400 paths × 120 bets · f deploy 2.73%
Sharpe / betμ/σ
0.223
μ 9.27% · σ 41.6%
Sortino / betμ/σ↓
3.398
downside-only denominator
VaR 95%5%
-2.7%
per-bet worst-case
CVaR 95%ES
-2.7%
mean tail loss
Max drawdownMDD
-32.1%
Calmar 0.14
Ruin rate≤50%
17.8%
P(equity ever ≤ 50%)
0.37×6387.23×12774.10×19160.96×25547.83×31934.69×020406080100120startruin 50%bet #bankroll multiple
median25/75 band5/95 bandruin line
Answers a different question: 'if I could find this exact edge forever, what is the bankroll trajectory'. Compounds 120 sequential resolutions which is NOT what happens to a single position.

§10 · Base-rate & macro context

Probability stack · base rate vs crowd vs model
ANCHORED · supported by convictionanchor gap -50.7pp · crowd gap -56.1pp
0%20%40%60%80%100%Reference base rate57.8%Market price1.8%Model P(YES)7.1%
Anchor gapmodel − base
-50.7 pp
Crowd gapprice − base
-56.1 pp
Verdictdiscipline
ANCHORED
Reference-class anchoring prevents narrative-driven blowups.

§11 · Forecast quality (synthetic ledger)

Brier · Murphy decomposition · reliability · ROC
SKILL POSITIVE · in-sample BSS 20.8% · AUC 0.773out-of-sample BSS (5-fold) 20.9% ± 1.0% · Brier 0.1976 · log-loss 0.5987 · n 1600n = 1600
BrierBS
0.1976
lower = better · ō 0.52
BSSvs base
20.8%
improvement over base rate
ReliabilityREL
0.0054
miscalibration · want ↓
ResolutionRES
0.0569
decisiveness · want ↑
Log lossLL
0.5987
cross-entropy
AUCROC
0.773
0.5 coin · 1.0 oracle
0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.20.40.60.81.0stated probability fobserved frequency ō0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.20.40.60.81.0AUC = 0.773false positive ratetrue positive rate0.0000.0750.1500.2240.2990.249UNC0.057RES0.005REL0.198BRIERcontribution
calibration curveROCUNC (irreducible)RES (skill, ↑)REL (miscalib, ↓)
Computed on a seeded synthetic forecast ledger. Reseed (⟳) to redraw.

§12 · Journal vitals (synthetic ledger)

Track record · win rate · PF · expectancy · CLV · equity curve
BLEEDING · PF 0.87 · expectancy -0.068R180 trades · win 48.3% · Sharpe -0.062
Total P/Lnet
-$3,051
on $45,000 cycled
Win ratehit %
48.3%
87 W / 93 L
Profit factorPF
0.87
$ won / $ lost
Expectancyper trade
-$16.95
avg $ per position
R-expectancyper risk
-0.068R
in units of risk taken
Avg win / losspayoff
$232.17 / -$250.00
ratio 0.93 : 1
Sharpe / traderisk-adj
-0.062
μR / σR
Closing line valueCLV
+2.99 pp
avg edge vs close
-$5,539-$4,171-$2,804-$1,436-$6803672108144180trade #cumulative P/L (USD)
cumulative P/Lprofitable zonered zonesynthetic · seeded from asset
The scorecard every trader checks. Synthetic ledger seeded from the asset slug — recomputes against your real fill history once wired.

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-person-a-win-the-2028-democratic-presidential-nomination · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts 105.88%
realized vol (ann.)
5.13%
max drawdown
5.41%
sharpe
ulcer index
1.89%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.79%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
5.41%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
2.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
2.00
upside/downside
roll spread
0.6 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
105.88%
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 25%
  • 24h change +105.88%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-person-a-win-the-2028-democratic-presidential-nomination/bundle · venue execution: polymarket