POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · STRAIT OF HORMUZ TRAFFIC RETURNS TO NORMAL BY END OF JUNE?

Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of June?

YES · live
21.0¢
NO · live
79.0¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · strait-of-hormuz-traffic-returns-to-normal-by-end-of-june · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
142.76%
max drawdown
12.77%
sharpe
ulcer index
7.28%
RMS drawdown
pain index
5.97%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
12.77%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
0.72
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
0.72
upside/downside
roll spread
1.1 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-strait-of-hormuz-traffic-returns-to-normal-by-end-of-june/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH93ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
21.0¢
NO · live
79.0¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.2262 · σ=0.0149 · range [0.1950, 0.2600] · R²=0.000 RISING +4.88%σ HIGH 6.58%LAST 0.21500.26000.24380.22750.21120.1950μ = 0.2262max 0.2600min 0.1950dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.00μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 21.50¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 21.0%NO 79.0%NO79.0%79.00¢ · odds 1/1.27
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.741 / 1.00 bits (74%) · moderate uncertainty
YES
21.0%21.0¢4.76× +0.00pp
NO
79.0%79.0¢1.27× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=3,100 · μ=129.2 · σ=115.1 · CV=0.89BURSTYcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=7088175263350μ = 12935050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 3100bp moved · peak 350bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
93ms
YES mid
21.00¢ (21.00%)
NO mid
79.00¢ (79.00%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$974.9k
liquidity $
$474.2k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.2262 · σ=0.0149 · range [0.1950, 0.2600] · R²=0.000 RISING +4.88%σ HIGH 6.58%LAST 0.21500.26000.24380.22750.21120.1950μ = 0.2262max 0.2600min 0.1950dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.00μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 21.50¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.7738 · σ=0.0149 · range [0.7400, 0.8050] · R²=0.000 FALLING -1.26%σ NORMAL 1.92%LAST 0.78500.80500.78880.77250.75620.7400μ = 0.7738max 0.8050min 0.7400dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.00μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 78.50¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0011 · σ=0.0158 · skew=-0.38 (symmetric) · kurt=-0.50 (mesokurtic)754204-2.67ppbin -2.67pp · n=4 · 57.1% peakbin -2.67pp · n=4 · 57.1% peak-2.02pp-1.37pp3-0.72ppbin -0.72pp · n=3 · 42.9% peakbin -0.72pp · n=3 · 42.9% peak7-0.07ppbin -0.07pp · n=7 · 100.0% peakbin -0.07pp · n=7 · 100.0% peak0.58pp61.23ppbin 1.23pp · n=6 · 85.7% peakbin 1.23pp · n=6 · 85.7% peak31.88ppbin 1.88pp · n=3 · 42.9% peakbin 1.88pp · n=3 · 42.9% peak2.53pp13.18ppbin 3.18pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakbin 3.18pp · n=1 · 14.3% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-0.37 · kurt=-0.38 · near 19 / mid 5 / far 0 · OLS slope=0.99 intercept=-0.00MATCHES NORMAL · WELL-BEHAVEDUPPER TAIL NORMALMILDLY HEAVY LOWER-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25APPROXIMATELY NORMAL · WELL-BEHAVED
μ MEAN22.62¢95% CI: [22.04¢, 23.20¢]
σ STD DEV1.49ppσ² = 2.214 · CV = 6.58%
med MEDIAN22.50¢Q₁ 21.50¢ · Q₃ 23.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 19.50¢Q₁ 21.50¢med 22.50¢Q₃ 23.50¢max 26.00¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁0.131approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-0.346mesokurtic · normal-like
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ median≈ equal · symmetric|μ−med| / σ = 0.08
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRconsistent with normalratio = 1.00
range ↔ σwide tails (range > 4σ)range / σ = 4.37
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.50 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.503negative · reversal
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.178lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.927strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT-0.064fails 5% test
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.927STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.503k=2+0.178k=3-0.107k=4+0.099k=5-0.0190+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.50 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCENOT SIGNIFICANT (|t|=0.06)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID1971905
SLUGstrait-of-hormuz…-end-of-june
CATEGORYStrait of Hormuz…end of June?
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES21.00¢implied prob 21.00% · decimal odds 4.76×
COUNTER · NO79.00¢implied prob 79.00% · decimal odds 1.27×
21.00¢
79.00¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME974.91k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY474.24k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (79¢)|primary − counter| = 0.580 · entropy 0.741 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHDEEP100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 21.0%NO 79.0%YES21.0%H = 0.741 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES4.76×(21¢)NO1.27×(79¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.741 bits (74% of max) · moderate uncertainty
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · DISTANTresolves 2026-06-30 00:00 UTC
15days
12hrs
50min
YES$1.00(P = 21.0%)
NO$0.00(P = 79.0%)
current: $0.2100 · expected return per side: $0.79 on YES hit · $0.21 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+7.8dRESOLVESP projection · σ=1.49% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 7.290 pp/day
now15.54d left
7.290 pp/day×1.00
−25%11.65d left
8.417 pp/day×1.15
−50%7.77d left
10.309 pp/day×1.41
−75%3.88d left
14.579 pp/day×2.00
−90%1.55d left
23.052 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 3.50% · worst -3.00% · typical |Δ| 1.29%MILD BULLISH +1.00%BEST+3.50%5hWORST-3.00%2hTYPICAL |Δ|1.29%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+1.00%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.57% · Σ +4.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.38% · Σ -3.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.00% · Σ +0.00%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +1.00%+5.50%-1.00%2.00% · 1h2.00% · 1h2.00%1h-3.00% · 2h-3.00% · 2h-3.00%2h▼ WORST2.00% · 3h2.00% · 3h2.00%3h1.00% · 4h1.00% · 4h1.00%4h3.50% · 5h3.50% · 5h3.50%5h★ BEST-3.00% · 6h-3.00% · 6h-3.00%6h1.50% · 7h1.50% · 7h1.50%7h0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h-1.00% · 9h-1.00% · 9h-1.00%9h1.00% · 10h1.00% · 10h1.00%10h-1.00% · 11h-1.00% · 11h-1.00%11h-1.00% · 12h-1.00% · 12h-1.00%12h1.00% · 13h1.00% · 13h1.00%13h-3.00% · 14h-3.00% · 14h-3.00%14h1.00% · 15h1.00% · 15h1.00%15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h1.00% · 17h1.00% · 17h1.00%17h0.00% · 18h0.00% · 18h·18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h2.00% · 22h2.00% · 22h2.00%22h-3.00% · 23h-3.00% · 23h-3.00%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNAsia-led (+4.00%)RUNSup max 3 · down max 2BREADTH42% up · 29% down · 29% flat
10 up bars · 7 down · best 3.50% · worst -3.00% · typical |Δ| 1.292%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +0.65%FINAL+0.65%MAX DD-5.47%RECOVERYONGOING · 19 barsMAX RUN-UP+5.50%UNDERWATER22/25 (88%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.0065 · peak 1.0550 · range [0.9894, 1.0550]1.05500.9894break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0550UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -5.47% · significant0%-5.47%▼ TROUGH -5.47%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 2 total#1 -5.47%bar 7-25 · 19 bars · ONGOING#2 -3.00%bar 3-5 · 3 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYsignificant (max -5.47%)RECOVERYongoing · 19 barsTIME UNDER WATER88% of session · 22/25 bars
final equity 1.0065 (0.65%) · max DD -5.47% · time-under-water 22/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +8 / −10 (42% positive) · μ=3.44 · σ=28.18MIXED EDGELAST -9.74 (-0.47σ vs μ)60.4230.210.00-30.21-60.42μ = 3.4414.1114.1111.4911.4935.3635.3614.0014.0014.0014.00-23.99-23.99-7.00-7.00-15.87-15.87-41.44-41.44-19.10-19.10-30.86-30.86-9.74-9.740.000.00-10.60-10.6060.4260.4238.2138.2155.9355.93-9.74-9.74-9.74-9.74v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -9.737 · range [-41.44, 60.42] · μ 3.444 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=148.3154 · σ=60.7378 · range [38.2099, 258.7296] · R²=0.500 FALLING -42.05%σ EXTREME 40.95%LAST 149.9467258.7296203.5997148.469893.339938.2099μ = 148.3154max 258.7296min 38.2099dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.50μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 149.95% · range [38.21%, 258.73%] · μ 148.32% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +0 / −19 (0% positive) · μ=-0.438 · σ=0.156MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.483 (-0.29σ vs μ)0.6330.3170.000-0.317-0.633μ = -0.438-0.488-0.488-0.456-0.456-0.522-0.522-0.494-0.494-0.615-0.615-0.458-0.458-0.176-0.176-0.489-0.489-0.480-0.480-0.633-0.633-0.630-0.630-0.561-0.561-0.500-0.500-0.249-0.249-0.333-0.333-0.233-0.233-0.071-0.071-0.444-0.444-0.483-0.483v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.483 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
1 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence1 reject·5 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
0.6521
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.7218
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainednormality not rejected
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
8.4305
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1328
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

REJECT H₀**

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-3.6190
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0057
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonestationary · mean-reverting (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
1.4327
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1520
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (12 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.1203
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4961
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedstationary not rejected (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-1.9264
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0541
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.414 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=3.23e-4 · top T=2.40h (31.2%) · top-3 cover 66.5%BROADBAND · 3 CYCLEScumulative energy ↗ (3 bins above 2× noise)1.2e-39.1e-46.1e-43.0e-40.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 5.61e-5 · 1.4% energyperiod 24.0 · power 5.61e-5 · 1.4% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.71e-4 · 4.4% energyperiod 12.0 · power 1.71e-4 · 4.4% energyperiod 8.0 · power 4.03e-5 · 1.0% energyperiod 8.0 · power 4.03e-5 · 1.0% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.39e-4 · 3.6% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.39e-4 · 3.6% energyperiod 4.8 · power 8.03e-7 · 0.0% energyperiod 4.8 · power 8.03e-7 · 0.0% energyperiod 4.0 · power 3.00e-4 · 7.7% energyperiod 4.0 · power 3.00e-4 · 7.7% energyperiod 3.4 · power 2.94e-4 · 7.6% energyperiod 3.4 · power 2.94e-4 · 7.6% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.64e-4 · 17.1% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.64e-4 · 17.1% energyperiod 2.7 · power 6.39e-5 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.7 · power 6.39e-5 · 1.6% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.21e-3 · 31.2% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.21e-3 · 31.2% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.32e-4 · 6.0% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.32e-4 · 6.0% energyperiod 2.0 · power 7.04e-4 · 18.2% energyperiod 2.0 · power 7.04e-4 · 18.2% energy50% by T=2.4h#1 dominantT=2.40h#2T=2.00h#3T=3.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.40h (freq 0.417) · concentrates 31.2% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 3.875e-3

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (2831 bars · effective 1752810 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 15.5 d · σ/bar 0.098pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 1.90ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.1659 · n = 2831n = 2831
μ per bar
-0.001pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.098pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.48pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move16d
1.90pp
σ × √372.84761694444444
Terminal variancebinary
0.1659
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
21.0¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.16pp · ES₉₅ 0.20pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift -0.001pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 1.00pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 2831
VaR 95%
0.16pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.20pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
16.3pp
peak 24.5¢ → trough 20.5¢
Median step
1.00pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
21.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
4.762
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+376
$100 wins $376
FractionalUK
3.76 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$376.19
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 21.0%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.741 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.741 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
2.25 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.34 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
46130022848920611732202507184264902690726361824951579816156441452797397798181
NO token ID
77669758102929718590160851391714019116736856202333459817343190730743895177270
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 11:09:08 UTC
Snapshot age
93ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 11:09:08 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
3a28deb2d65775dfc456dddfc558759755945711b57c1db145a771ac04781060 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of June?

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.215000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
465.1bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.291
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.403
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-strait-of-hormuz-traffic-returns-to-normal-by-end-of-june/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.220000232.56bp0.2200001FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.230286710.98bp0.2400003FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.3040074139.85bp0.45000024FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.204473489.65bp0.2000002FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.1885091232.12bp0.1700005FILLED
SELL$100.00K0.0262088781.04bp0.01000021PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 2,831 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
587.70%
σ per bar = 0.004439
Mean return (annualised)
-6966.52%
μ per bar = -0.000040
Sharpe (rf=0)
-11.85
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
16.33%
peak 0.24 → trough 0.20 over 761 bars

/api/asset/pm-strait-of-hormuz-traffic-returns-to-normal-by-end-of-june/risk · same metrics, JSON