POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · IEM COLOGNE MAJOR 2026 WINNER

Will Aurora win IEM Cologne Major 2026?

YES · live
2.5¢
NO · live
97.5¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-aurora-win-iem-cologne-major-2026 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts 133.33%
realized vol (ann.)
29.00%
max drawdown
10.34%
sharpe
ulcer index
4.21%
RMS drawdown
pain index
1.85%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
10.34%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
9.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
9.00
upside/downside
roll spread
8.5 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
133.33%
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 25%
  • 24h change +133.33%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-aurora-win-iem-cologne-major-2026/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH15ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
2.5¢
NO · live
97.5¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.0137 · σ=0.0038 · range [0.0105, 0.0255] · R²=0.430 RISING +75.86%σ EXTREME 27.97%LAST 0.02550.02550.02170.01800.01430.0105μ = 0.0137max 0.0255min 0.0105dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.43μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 2.55¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 2.5%NO 97.5%NO97.5%97.55¢ · odds 1/1.03
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.166 / 1.00 bits (17%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
2.5%2.5¢40.82× +0.00pp
NO
97.5%97.5¢1.03× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=260 · μ=10.8 · σ=21.2 · CV=1.96BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=170265279105μ = 1110550%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 260bp moved · peak 105bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
15ms
YES mid
2.45¢ (2.45%)
NO mid
97.55¢ (97.55%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$70.7k
liquidity $
$41.1k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.0137 · σ=0.0038 · range [0.0105, 0.0255] · R²=0.430 RISING +75.86%σ EXTREME 27.97%LAST 0.02550.02550.02170.01800.01430.0105μ = 0.0137max 0.0255min 0.0105dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.43μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 2.55¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.9863 · σ=0.0038 · range [0.9745, 0.9895] · R²=0.430 FALLING -1.12%σ LOW 0.39%LAST 0.97450.98950.98580.98200.97830.9745μ = 0.9863max 0.9895min 0.9745dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.43μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 97.45¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0004 · σ=0.0022 · skew=3.11 (right-skewed) · kurt=10.60 (leptokurtic (fat tails))1296305-0.14ppbin -0.14pp · n=5 · 41.7% peakbin -0.14pp · n=5 · 41.7% peak12-0.01ppbin -0.01pp · n=12 · 100.0% peakbin -0.01pp · n=12 · 100.0% peak40.11ppbin 0.11pp · n=4 · 33.3% peakbin 0.11pp · n=4 · 33.3% peak20.24ppbin 0.24pp · n=2 · 16.7% peakbin 0.24pp · n=2 · 16.7% peak0.36pp0.49pp0.61pp0.74pp0.86pp10.99ppbin 0.99pp · n=1 · 8.3% peakbin 0.99pp · n=1 · 8.3% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=3.38 · kurt=12.26 · near 8 / mid 15 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.77 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALTHIN LOWER TAIL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+2.33σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=4.19)
μ MEAN1.37¢95% CI: [1.22¢, 1.52¢]
σ STD DEV0.38ppσ² = 0.147 · CV = 27.97%
med MEDIAN1.25¢Q₁ 1.15¢ · Q₃ 1.45¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 1.05¢Q₁ 1.15¢med 1.25¢Q₃ 1.45¢max 2.55¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁2.199right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂4.186leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ > med · right-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.32
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 1.73
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.91
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ADF rejects unit root
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.049within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.024lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.735strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+4.165significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.735STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.049k=2-0.024k=3-0.012k=4+0.107k=5-0.0620+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ADF rejects unit rootfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.52high · clear structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=4.16)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID1892308
SLUGwill-aurora-win-iem-cologne-major-2026
CATEGORYIEM Cologne Major 2026 Winner
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES2.45¢implied prob 2.45% · decimal odds 40.82×
COUNTER · NO97.55¢implied prob 97.55% · decimal odds 1.03×
2.45¢
97.55¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME70.72k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY41.09k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (98¢)|primary − counter| = 0.951 · entropy 0.166 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 2.5%NO 97.5%YES2.5%H = 0.166 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES40.82×(2¢)NO1.03×(98¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.166 bits (17% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-21 00:00 UTC
6days
07hrs
49min
YES$1.00(P = 2.5%)
NO$0.00(P = 97.5%)
current: $0.0245 · expected return per side: $0.98 on YES hit · $0.02 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+3.2dRESOLVESP projection · σ=0.38% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 1.880 pp/day
now6.33d left
1.880 pp/day×1.00
−25%4.74d left
2.171 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.16d left
2.659 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.58d left
3.761 pp/day×2.00
−90%15.18h left
5.946 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 1.05% · worst -0.20% · typical |Δ| 0.11%MILD BULLISH +1.10%BEST+1.05%23hWORST-0.20%1hTYPICAL |Δ|0.11%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+1.10%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ -0.04% · Σ -0.30%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.03% · Σ +0.20%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.15% · Σ +1.20%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +1.10%+1.10%-0.40%-0.20% · 1h-0.20% · 1h-0.20%1h▼ WORST-0.15% · 2h-0.15% · 2h-0.15%2h0.00% · 3h0.00% · 3h·3h-0.05% · 4h-0.05% · 4h-0.05%4h0.10% · 5h0.10% · 5h0.10%5h0.00% · 6h0.00% · 6h·6h0.00% · 7h0.00% · 7h·7h0.10% · 8h0.10% · 8h0.10%8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h-0.10% · 10h-0.10% · 10h-0.10%10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h-0.10% · 12h-0.10% · 12h-0.10%12h0.20% · 13h0.20% · 13h0.20%13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.10% · 15h0.10% · 15h0.10%15h0.10% · 16h0.10% · 16h0.10%16h-0.10% · 17h-0.10% · 17h-0.10%17h-0.05% · 18h-0.05% · 18h-0.05%18h0.20% · 19h0.20% · 19h0.20%19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h1.05% · 23h1.05% · 23h1.05%23h★ BEST0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+1.20%)RUNSup max 2 · down max 2BREADTH29% up · 29% down · 42% flat
7 up bars · 7 down · best 1.05% · worst -0.20% · typical |Δ| 0.108%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +1.10%FINAL+1.10%MAX DD-0.40%RECOVERYFULLY RECOVEREDMAX RUN-UP+1.10%UNDERWATER18/25 (72%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.0110 · peak 1.0110 · range [0.9960, 1.0110]1.01100.9960break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0110UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -0.40% · shallow0%-0.40%▼ TROUGH -0.40%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 1 total#1 -0.40%bar 2-19 · 18 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYshallow (max -0.40%)RECOVERYfully recoveredTIME UNDER WATER72% of session · 18/25 bars
final equity 1.0110 (1.10%) · max DD -0.40% · time-under-water 18/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +14 / −3 (74% positive) · μ=17.70 · σ=25.07PROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 46.42 (+1.15σ vs μ)46.4223.210.00-23.21-46.42μ = 17.70-42.72-42.72-19.10-19.1038.2138.2138.2138.2120.7220.720.000.00-20.72-20.7213.3413.340.000.0013.3413.3444.6244.6225.7625.7635.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0021.5921.597.647.6444.0044.0046.4246.42v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 46.424 · range [-42.72, 46.42] · μ 17.700 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=12.2512 · σ=9.8112 · range [5.7315, 39.8191] · R²=0.386 RISING +283.42%σ EXTREME 80.08%LAST 39.311739.819131.297222.775314.25345.7315μ = 12.2512max 39.8191min 5.7315dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.39μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 39.31% · range [5.73%, 39.82%] · μ 12.25% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +1 / −17 (5% positive) · μ=-0.200 · σ=0.201MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.297 (-0.48σ vs μ)0.5670.2830.000-0.283-0.567μ = -0.2000.2920.292-0.133-0.133-0.367-0.367-0.567-0.567-0.069-0.0690.0000.000-0.010-0.010-0.248-0.248-0.333-0.333-0.321-0.321-0.409-0.409-0.470-0.470-0.015-0.015-0.142-0.142-0.209-0.209-0.287-0.287-0.121-0.121-0.099-0.099-0.297-0.297v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.297 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
293.9247
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
0.5691
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9873
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
0.2445
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.9756
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
-1.1127
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2658
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (6 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.5928
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0233
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-1.0905
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2755
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.668 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=5.73e-6 · top T=2.00h (15.5%) · top-3 cover 43.2%WHITE NOISE · no dominant cyclecumulative energy ↗ (0 bins above 2× noise)1.1e-58.0e-65.3e-62.7e-60.0e+0μ noise floorperiod 24.0 · power 2.79e-6 · 4.1% energyperiod 24.0 · power 2.79e-6 · 4.1% energyperiod 12.0 · power 2.54e-6 · 3.7% energyperiod 12.0 · power 2.54e-6 · 3.7% energyperiod 8.0 · power 9.61e-6 · 14.0% energyperiod 8.0 · power 9.61e-6 · 14.0% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.01e-6 · 4.4% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.01e-6 · 4.4% energyperiod 4.8 · power 9.45e-6 · 13.7% energyperiod 4.8 · power 9.45e-6 · 13.7% energyperiod 4.0 · power 8.10e-6 · 11.8% energyperiod 4.0 · power 8.10e-6 · 11.8% energyperiod 3.4 · power 8.56e-6 · 12.4% energyperiod 3.4 · power 8.56e-6 · 12.4% energyperiod 3.0 · power 3.89e-6 · 5.6% energyperiod 3.0 · power 3.89e-6 · 5.6% energyperiod 2.7 · power 2.68e-6 · 3.9% energyperiod 2.7 · power 2.68e-6 · 3.9% energyperiod 2.4 · power 4.85e-6 · 7.1% energyperiod 2.4 · power 4.85e-6 · 7.1% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.66e-6 · 3.9% energyperiod 2.2 · power 2.66e-6 · 3.9% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.07e-5 · 15.5% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.07e-5 · 15.5% energy50% by T=4.0h#1 dominantT=2.00h#2T=8.00h#3T=4.80hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.00h (freq 0.500) · concentrates 15.5% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 6.881e-5

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (3825 bars · effective 1752908 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 6.3 d · σ/bar 0.016pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.20ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0239 · n = 3825n = 3825
μ per bar
+0.000pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.016pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.08pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move6d
0.20pp
σ × √151.81796805555555
Terminal variancebinary
0.0239
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
2.5¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.03pp · ES₉₅ 0.03pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.000pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.05pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 3825
VaR 95%
0.03pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.03pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
16.0pp
peak 1.3¢ → trough 1.1¢
Median step
0.05pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
2.5%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
40.816
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+3982
$100 wins $3982
FractionalUK
39.82 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$3981.63
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 2.5%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.166 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.166 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
5.35 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.04 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
38593763917483827074176755593922910259318136371714467098478660125814421010764
NO token ID
38403104444578476619741224765593763777297248538254648839504245151313112480585
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 16:10:55 UTC
Snapshot age
15ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 16:10:55 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
a0689b195d992a5f4146d78275b16bee518addc622e579cd46313442f50cd879 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in IEM Cologne Major 2026 Winner

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.025500
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
2745.1bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.954
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.159
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-aurora-win-iem-cologne-major-2026/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.0433517000.29bp0.06300016FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.24123484601.68bp0.80000057FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.749253283824.55bp0.99900067FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.0035148621.97bp0.00100019PARTIAL
SELL$10.00K0.0035148621.97bp0.00100019PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.0035148621.97bp0.00100019PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 3,825 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
1227.36%
σ per bar = 0.009270
Mean return (annualised)
38839.83%
μ per bar = 0.000222
Sharpe (rf=0)
31.65
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
16.00%
peak 0.01 → trough 0.01 over 817 bars

/api/asset/pm-will-aurora-win-iem-cologne-major-2026/risk · same metrics, JSON