POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · VALORANT MASTERS LONDON 2026: WINNER

Will EDward Gaming win Valorant Masters London 2026?

YES · live
7.8¢
NO · live
92.3¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts 0.00%
realized vol (ann.)
5.92%
max drawdown
2.52%
sharpe
ulcer index
0.32%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.04%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
0.04%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
0.00
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
0.00
upside/downside
roll spread
0.3 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
2000
store
spread
24h Δ
0.00%
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH30ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
7.8¢
NO · live
92.3¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.0779 · σ=0.0033 · range [0.0680, 0.0795] · R²=0.332 RISING +11.51%σ NORMAL 4.19%LAST 0.07750.07950.07660.07380.07090.0680μ = 0.0779max 0.0795min 0.0680dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.33μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 7.75¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 7.8%NO 92.3%NO92.3%92.25¢ · odds 1/1.08
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.393 / 1.00 bits (39%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
7.8%7.8¢12.90× +0.00pp
NO
92.3%92.3¢1.08× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=220 · μ=9.2 · σ=19.8 · CV=2.16BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=3022456790μ = 99050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 220bp moved · peak 90bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
30ms
YES mid
7.75¢ (7.75%)
NO mid
92.25¢ (92.25%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$44.3k
liquidity $
$29.8k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.0779 · σ=0.0033 · range [0.0680, 0.0795] · R²=0.332 RISING +11.51%σ NORMAL 4.19%LAST 0.07750.07950.07660.07380.07090.0680μ = 0.0779max 0.0795min 0.0680dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.33μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 7.75¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.9221 · σ=0.0033 · range [0.9205, 0.9320] · R²=0.332 FALLING -0.86%σ LOW 0.35%LAST 0.92250.93200.92910.92630.92340.9205μ = 0.9221max 0.9320min 0.9205dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.33μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 92.25¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=0.0001 · σ=0.0020 · skew=2.84 (right-skewed) · kurt=9.51 (leptokurtic (fat tails))16128401-0.29ppbin -0.29pp · n=1 · 6.3% peakbin -0.29pp · n=1 · 6.3% peak2-0.16ppbin -0.16pp · n=2 · 12.5% peakbin -0.16pp · n=2 · 12.5% peak16-0.04ppbin -0.04pp · n=16 · 100.0% peakbin -0.04pp · n=16 · 100.0% peak20.09ppbin 0.09pp · n=2 · 12.5% peakbin 0.09pp · n=2 · 12.5% peak20.21ppbin 0.21pp · n=2 · 12.5% peakbin 0.21pp · n=2 · 12.5% peak0.34pp0.46pp0.59pp0.71pp10.84ppbin 0.84pp · n=1 · 6.3% peakbin 0.84pp · n=1 · 6.3% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=2.61 · kurt=9.33 · near 6 / mid 17 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.79 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=+2.06σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=2.75)
μ MEAN7.79¢95% CI: [7.66¢, 7.92¢]
σ STD DEV0.33ppσ² = 0.106 · CV = 4.19%
med MEDIAN7.95¢Q₁ 7.75¢ · Q₃ 7.95¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 6.80¢Q₁ 7.75¢med 7.95¢Q₃ 7.95¢max 7.95¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁-2.015left-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂2.745leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ < med · left-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.50
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 2.20
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 3.53
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.43 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.434negative · reversal
ρ(2) AUTOCORR+0.335lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.911strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT+3.383significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.911STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.434k=2+0.335k=3-0.032k=4-0.072k=5+0.1190+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.43 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=3.38)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2446001
SLUGwill-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026
CATEGORYValorant Masters London 2026: Winner
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES7.75¢implied prob 7.75% · decimal odds 12.90×
COUNTER · NO92.25¢implied prob 92.25% · decimal odds 1.08×
7.75¢
92.25¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME44.26k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY29.78k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (92¢)|primary − counter| = 0.845 · entropy 0.393 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 7.8%NO 92.3%YES7.8%H = 0.393 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES12.90×(8¢)NO1.08×(92¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.393 bits (39% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-21 00:00 UTC
6days
07hrs
43min
YES$1.00(P = 7.8%)
NO$0.00(P = 92.3%)
current: $0.0775 · expected return per side: $0.92 on YES hit · $0.08 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+3.2dRESOLVESP projection · σ=0.33% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 1.597 pp/day
now6.32d left
1.597 pp/day×1.00
−25%4.74d left
1.844 pp/day×1.15
−50%3.16d left
2.259 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.58d left
3.195 pp/day×2.00
−90%15.17h left
5.051 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 0.90% · worst -0.35% · typical |Δ| 0.09%MILD BULLISH +0.80%BEST+0.90%3hWORST-0.35%2hTYPICAL |Δ|0.09%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE+0.80%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.13% · Σ +0.90%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ +0.01% · Σ +0.10%US · 16-24 UTCμ -0.03% · Σ -0.20%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final +0.80%+1.00%-0.15%0.20% · 1h0.20% · 1h0.20%1h-0.35% · 2h-0.35% · 2h-0.35%2h▼ WORST0.90% · 3h0.90% · 3h0.90%3h★ BEST-0.05% · 4h-0.05% · 4h-0.05%4h0.25% · 5h0.25% · 5h0.25%5h0.05% · 6h0.05% · 6h0.05%6h-0.10% · 7h-0.10% · 7h-0.10%7h0.10% · 8h0.10% · 8h0.10%8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h0.00% · 12h0.00% · 12h·12h0.00% · 13h0.00% · 13h·13h0.00% · 14h0.00% · 14h·14h0.00% · 15h0.00% · 15h·15h0.00% · 16h0.00% · 16h·16h0.00% · 17h0.00% · 17h·17h0.00% · 18h0.00% · 18h·18h0.00% · 19h0.00% · 19h·19h0.00% · 20h0.00% · 20h·20h0.00% · 21h0.00% · 21h·21h0.00% · 22h0.00% · 22h·22h-0.20% · 23h-0.20% · 23h-0.20%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNAsia-led (+0.90%)RUNSup max 2 · down max 1BREADTH21% up · 17% down · 63% flat
5 up bars · 4 down · best 0.90% · worst -0.35% · typical |Δ| 0.092%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsPROFITABLE +0.80%FINAL+0.80%MAX DD-0.35%RECOVERYONGOING · 1 barsMAX RUN-UP+1.00%UNDERWATER20/25 (80%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 1.0080 · peak 1.0100 · range [0.9985, 1.0100]1.01000.9985break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0100UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -0.35% · shallow0%-0.35%▼ TROUGH -0.35%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 3 total#1 -0.35%bar 3-3 · 1 bars · recovered#2 -0.20%bar 8-25 · 18 bars · ONGOING#3 -0.05%bar 5-5 · 1 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYshallow (max -0.35%)RECOVERYongoing · 23 barsTIME UNDER WATER80% of session · 20/25 bars
final equity 1.0080 (0.80%) · max DD -0.35% · time-under-water 20/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +7 / −2 (37% positive) · μ=8.21 · σ=23.81MIXED EDGELAST -38.21 (-1.95σ vs μ)48.7524.370.00-24.37-48.75μ = 8.2137.3237.3225.3425.3448.7548.7531.4131.4139.5539.5511.7411.740.000.0038.2138.210.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-38.21-38.21-38.21-38.21v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -38.210 · range [-38.21, 48.75] · μ 8.205 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=8.8330 · σ=13.5875 · range [0.0000, 40.3291] · R²=0.488 FALLING -80.46%σ EXTREME 153.83%LAST 7.642040.329130.246920.164610.08230.0000μ = 8.8330max 40.3291min 0.0000dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.49μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 7.64% · range [0.00%, 40.33%] · μ 8.83% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +0 / −10 (0% positive) · μ=-0.178 · σ=0.249MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.233 (-0.22σ vs μ)0.6820.3410.000-0.341-0.682μ = -0.178-0.667-0.667-0.552-0.552-0.185-0.185-0.379-0.379-0.107-0.107-0.682-0.682-0.500-0.500-0.033-0.0330.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000-0.033-0.033-0.233-0.233v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.233 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
173.2054
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
8.9533
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1098
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

REJECT H₀*

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-3.0491
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0318
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonestationary · mean-reverting (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
1.8474
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0647
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (8 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.4586
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0519
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedstationary not rejected (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-1.1380
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.2551
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.654 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=4.77e-6 · top T=2.40h (21.4%) · top-3 cover 55.6%2 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEScumulative energy ↗ (2 bins above 2× noise)1.2e-59.2e-66.1e-63.1e-60.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 3.19e-6 · 5.6% energyperiod 24.0 · power 3.19e-6 · 5.6% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.56e-6 · 6.2% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.56e-6 · 6.2% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.96e-6 · 5.2% energyperiod 8.0 · power 2.96e-6 · 5.2% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.70e-6 · 3.0% energyperiod 6.0 · power 1.70e-6 · 3.0% energyperiod 4.8 · power 6.21e-7 · 1.1% energyperiod 4.8 · power 6.21e-7 · 1.1% energyperiod 4.0 · power 6.04e-7 · 1.1% energyperiod 4.0 · power 6.04e-7 · 1.1% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.16e-6 · 2.0% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.16e-6 · 2.0% energyperiod 3.0 · power 4.57e-6 · 8.0% energyperiod 3.0 · power 4.57e-6 · 8.0% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.06e-5 · 18.5% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.06e-5 · 18.5% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.22e-5 · 21.4% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.22e-5 · 21.4% energyperiod 2.2 · power 8.98e-6 · 15.7% energyperiod 2.2 · power 8.98e-6 · 15.7% energyperiod 2.0 · power 7.04e-6 · 12.3% energyperiod 2.0 · power 7.04e-6 · 12.3% energy50% by T=2.7h#1 dominantT=2.40h#2T=2.67h#3T=2.18hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.40h (freq 0.417) · concentrates 21.4% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 5.719e-5

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (3851 bars · effective 1752908 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 6.3 d · σ/bar 0.006pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.07ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0715 · n = 3851n = 3851
μ per bar
+0.000pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.006pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.03pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move6d
0.07pp
σ × √151.72287972222222
Terminal variancebinary
0.0715
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
7.8¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.01pp · ES₉₅ 0.01pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.000pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 0.10pp · unique ratio 0.00n = 3851
VaR 95%
0.01pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.01pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
2.5pp
peak 8.0¢ → trough 7.8¢
Median step
0.10pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
7.8%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
12.903
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+1190
$100 wins $1190
FractionalUK
11.90 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$1190.32
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 7.8%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.393 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.393 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
3.69 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.12 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
80054126073210525879218034466600611627237064841832704029915317715907713903524
NO token ID
50876559477793340069750557376325828743957078014629898679783306797505030211577
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 16:16:37 UTC
Snapshot age
30ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 16:16:37 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
f2f6ed43fd305856d1c3afa6c2b21e29af0ec04979a6c8961d443e25e542fc13 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Valorant Masters London 2026: Winner

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.077500
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
645.2bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
-0.805
ask-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
-0.983
ask-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.080000322.58bp0.0800001FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.27985426110.26bp0.98000042FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.78388691146.56bp0.98000042FILLED
SELL$1.00K0.0250126772.58bp0.00100023PARTIAL
SELL$10.00K0.0250126772.58bp0.00100023PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.0250126772.58bp0.00100023PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 3,851 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
99.15%
σ per bar = 0.000749
Mean return (annualised)
0.00%
μ per bar = 0.000000
Sharpe (rf=0)
0.00
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
2.52%
peak 0.08 → trough 0.08 over 3358 bars

/api/asset/pm-will-edward-gaming-win-valorant-masters-london-2026/risk · same metrics, JSON