POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · GRASS COURT CHAMPIONSHIPS, QUALIFICATION: LULU SUN VS ANHELINA KALININA

Grass Court Championships, Qualification: Lulu Sun vs Anhelina Kalinina

YES · live
13.0¢
NO · live
87.0¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · wta-sun-kalinin-2026-06-13 · fresh · feed 0s old
24h sparkline · 60 pts
realized vol (ann.)
77.16%
max drawdown
0.00%
sharpe
ulcer index
0.00%
RMS drawdown
pain index
0.00%
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
0.00%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
0.00%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
upside/downside
roll spread
6.6 bps
implied (price-only)
bars used
368
store
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 20%
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-wta-sun-kalinin-2026-06-13/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH2ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
13.0¢
NO · live
87.0¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.2698 · σ=0.1376 · range [0.1050, 0.3950] · R²=0.753 FALLING -67.09%σ EXTREME 51.01%LAST 0.13000.39500.32250.25000.17750.1050μ = 0.2698max 0.3950min 0.1050dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.75μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 13.00¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 13.0%NO 87.0%NO87.0%87.00¢ · odds 1/1.15
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.557 / 1.00 bits (56%) · moderate uncertainty
YES
13.0%13.0¢7.69× +0.00pp
NO
87.0%87.0¢1.15× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=3,850 · μ=160.4 · σ=419.6 · CV=2.62BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=1404889751,4631,950μ = 1601,95050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 3850bp moved · peak 1950bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
2ms
YES mid
13.00¢ (13.00%)
NO mid
87.00¢ (87.00%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$44.8k
liquidity $
$24.2k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.2698 · σ=0.1376 · range [0.1050, 0.3950] · R²=0.753 FALLING -67.09%σ EXTREME 51.01%LAST 0.13000.39500.32250.25000.17750.1050μ = 0.2698max 0.3950min 0.1050dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.75μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 13.00¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.7302 · σ=0.1376 · range [0.6050, 0.8950] · R²=0.753 RISING +43.80%σ EXTREME 18.85%LAST 0.87000.89500.82250.75000.67750.6050μ = 0.7302max 0.8950min 0.6050dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.75μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 87.00¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=-0.0069 · σ=0.0413 · skew=-3.46 (left-skewed) · kurt=11.55 (leptokurtic (fat tails))17139401-18.43ppbin -18.43pp · n=1 · 5.9% peakbin -18.43pp · n=1 · 5.9% peak-16.28pp-14.12pp-11.97pp-9.83pp1-7.67ppbin -7.67pp · n=1 · 5.9% peakbin -7.67pp · n=1 · 5.9% peak-5.52pp-3.38pp5-1.22ppbin -1.22pp · n=5 · 29.4% peakbin -1.22pp · n=5 · 29.4% peak170.93ppbin 0.93pp · n=17 · 100.0% peakbin 0.93pp · n=17 · 100.0% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-3.50 · kurt=11.76 · near 6 / mid 13 / far 5 · OLS slope=0.68 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSTHIN UPPER TAILLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=-2.27σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25PLATYKURTIC · THIN TAILS (G₂=-2.00)
μ MEAN26.98¢95% CI: [21.59¢, 32.37¢]
σ STD DEV13.76ppσ² = 189.406 · CV = 51.01%
med MEDIAN39.00¢Q₁ 12.00¢ · Q₃ 39.50¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 10.50¢Q₁ 12.00¢med 39.00¢Q₃ 39.50¢max 39.50¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁-0.196approximately symmetric
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂-2.001platykurtic · thin tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ < med · left-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.87
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 0.68
range ↔ σconcentrated (range < 4σ)range / σ = 2.11
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: TRENDING · variance ratio > 1
ρ(1) AUTOCORR+0.317within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.049lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.898strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT-8.366significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.898STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1+0.317k=2-0.049k=3-0.139k=4-0.072k=5-0.1210+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONTRENDING · variance ratio > 1from Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 1.00very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=8.37)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID2530030
SLUGwta-sun-kalinin-2026-06-13
CATEGORYGrass Court Cham…ina Kalinina
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES13.00¢implied prob 13.00% · decimal odds 7.69×
COUNTER · NO87.00¢implied prob 87.00% · decimal odds 1.15×
13.00¢
87.00¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME44.77k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY24.21k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (87¢)|primary − counter| = 0.740 · entropy 0.557 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHACTIVE100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 13.0%NO 87.0%YES13.0%H = 0.557 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES7.69×(13¢)NO1.15×(87¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.557 bits (56% of max) · moderate uncertainty
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · LOWresolves 2026-06-20 14:00 UTC
5days
16hrs
21min
YES$1.00(P = 13.0%)
NO$0.00(P = 87.0%)
current: $0.1300 · expected return per side: $0.87 on YES hit · $0.13 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+2.8dRESOLVESP projection · σ=13.76% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 67.422 pp/day
now5.68d left
67.422 pp/day×1.00
−25%4.26d left
77.852 pp/day×1.15
−50%2.84d left
95.349 pp/day×1.41
−75%1.42d left
134.844 pp/day×2.00
−90%13.64h left
213.207 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 2.00% · worst -19.50% · typical |Δ| 1.60%BEARISH SESSION -26.50%BEST+2.00%21hWORST-19.50%14hTYPICAL |Δ|1.60%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE-26.50%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.00% · Σ +0.00%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -3.63% · Σ -29.00%US · 16-24 UTCμ +0.31% · Σ +2.50%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final -26.50%+0.00%-29.00%0.00% · 1h0.00% · 1h·1h0.00% · 2h0.00% · 2h·2h0.00% · 3h0.00% · 3h·3h0.00% · 4h0.00% · 4h·4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h0.00% · 6h0.00% · 6h·6h0.00% · 7h0.00% · 7h·7h0.00% · 8h0.00% · 8h·8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h0.00% · 10h0.00% · 10h·10h0.00% · 11h0.00% · 11h·11h-0.50% · 12h-0.50% · 12h-0.50%12h-8.50% · 13h-8.50% · 13h-8.50%13h-19.50% · 14h-19.50% · 14h-19.50%14h▼ WORST-0.50% · 15h-0.50% · 15h-0.50%15h0.50% · 16h0.50% · 16h0.50%16h1.00% · 17h1.00% · 17h1.00%17h-0.50% · 18h-0.50% · 18h-0.50%18h1.00% · 19h1.00% · 19h1.00%19h-1.00% · 20h-1.00% · 20h-1.00%20h2.00% · 21h2.00% · 21h2.00%21h★ BEST-2.00% · 22h-2.00% · 22h-2.00%22h1.50% · 23h1.50% · 23h1.50%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNUS-led (+2.50%)RUNSup max 2 · down max 4BREADTH21% up · 29% down · 50% flat
5 up bars · 7 down · best 2.00% · worst -19.50% · typical |Δ| 1.604%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsSEVERE DRAWDOWN -25.28%FINAL-25.28%MAX DD-27.08%RECOVERYONGOING · 13 barsMAX RUN-UP+0.00%UNDERWATER13/25 (52%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 0.7472 · peak 1.0000 · range [0.7292, 1.0000]1.00000.7292break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0000UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -27.08% · severe0%-27.08%▼ TROUGH -27.08%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 1 total#1 -27.08%bar 13-25 · 13 bars · ONGOINGDD SEVERITYsevere (max -27.08%)RECOVERYongoing · 13 barsTIME UNDER WATER52% of session · 13/25 bars
final equity 0.7472 (-25.28%) · max DD -27.08% · time-under-water 13/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +5 / −8 (26% positive) · μ=-16.12 · σ=30.51UNPROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST 15.18 (+1.03σ vs μ)57.1928.600.00-28.60-57.19μ = -16.120.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-38.21-38.21-40.87-40.87-55.80-55.80-57.19-57.19-55.76-55.76-52.95-52.95-52.95-52.95-34.61-34.619.069.0642.7242.725.215.219.939.9315.1815.18v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest 15.183 · range [-57.19, 42.72] · μ -16.118 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=287.5373 · σ=333.2839 · range [0.0000, 759.2154] · R²=0.099 FLATσ EXTREME 115.91%LAST 144.2394759.2154569.4115379.6077189.80380.0000μ = 287.5373max 759.2154min 0.0000dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.10μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 144.24% · range [0.00%, 759.22%] · μ 287.54% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +7 / −6 (37% positive) · μ=-0.151 · σ=0.368CLOSE TO MARTINGALELAST -0.858 (-1.92σ vs μ)0.8580.4290.000-0.429-0.858μ = -0.1510.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000-0.033-0.0330.0210.0210.3300.3300.0600.0600.0600.0600.0930.0930.2120.2120.0050.005-0.519-0.519-0.667-0.667-0.726-0.726-0.854-0.854-0.858-0.858v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.858 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
2 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence2 reject·4 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
279.0652
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
3.9979
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.5517
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-0.6830
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.8435
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
0.7287
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4662
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (8 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

REJECT H₀**

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.7691
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0085
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-stationary (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
1.6494
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0991
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 1.502 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=1.89e-3 · top T=24.00h (14.8%) · top-3 cover 43.0%WHITE NOISE · no dominant cyclecumulative energy ↗ (0 bins above 2× noise)3.3e-32.5e-31.7e-38.4e-40.0e+0μ noise floorperiod 24.0 · power 3.35e-3 · 14.8% energyperiod 24.0 · power 3.35e-3 · 14.8% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.29e-3 · 14.5% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.29e-3 · 14.5% energyperiod 8.0 · power 3.11e-3 · 13.7% energyperiod 8.0 · power 3.11e-3 · 13.7% energyperiod 6.0 · power 2.78e-3 · 12.3% energyperiod 6.0 · power 2.78e-3 · 12.3% energyperiod 4.8 · power 2.25e-3 · 9.9% energyperiod 4.8 · power 2.25e-3 · 9.9% energyperiod 4.0 · power 2.07e-3 · 9.1% energyperiod 4.0 · power 2.07e-3 · 9.1% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.15e-3 · 5.1% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.15e-3 · 5.1% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.07e-3 · 4.7% energyperiod 3.0 · power 1.07e-3 · 4.7% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.07e-3 · 4.7% energyperiod 2.7 · power 1.07e-3 · 4.7% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.99e-4 · 0.9% energyperiod 2.4 · power 1.99e-4 · 0.9% energyperiod 2.2 · power 7.40e-4 · 3.3% energyperiod 2.2 · power 7.40e-4 · 3.3% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.58e-3 · 7.0% energyperiod 2.0 · power 1.58e-3 · 7.0% energy50% by T=6.0h#1 dominantT=24.00h#2T=12.00h#3T=8.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 24.00h (freq 0.042) · concentrates 14.8% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 2.267e-2

▸ Depth section using sovereign-store price series (368 bars · effective 1753103 bars/year) — annualisation reflects native polling cadence, not upstream timeframes.

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 5.7 d · σ/bar 0.058pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 0.68ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.1131 · n = 368n = 368
μ per bar
+0.004pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.058pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
0.29pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move6d
0.68pp
σ × √136.36138944444446
Terminal variancebinary
0.1131
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
13.0¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.09pp · ES₉₅ 0.12pp · method parametric · drift-correcteddrift +0.004pp/bar · quantised: yes · median step 1.00pp · unique ratio 0.01n = 368
VaR 95%
0.09pp
1.645·σ (parametric) of Δp
ES 95%
0.12pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
0.0pp
peak 11.5¢ → trough 11.5¢
Median step
1.00pp
price bucket granularity
Price series is bucketed (cent grid). Empirical quantiles collapse to grid points — parametric N(0, σ²) used instead.
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
13.0%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
7.692
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+669
$100 wins $669
FractionalUK
6.69 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$669.23
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 13.0%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.557 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.557 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
2.94 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.20 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
70948878970708286724076232856436836090013344619573443681782415618909111237607
NO token ID
106050748533593234122131497171903194685685902145132450881886395523044036701507
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 21:38:18 UTC
Snapshot age
2ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 21:38:18 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
dd42fe2340c241b545c5755d594f297ccef568f215944d28751a3e6edda3601d · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Grass Court Championships, Qualification: Lulu Sun vs Anhelina Kalinina

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.130000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
1538.5bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.079
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
+0.429
bid-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-wta-sun-kalinin-2026-06-13/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.1566682051.35bp0.1600003FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.43282123293.94bp0.99000013FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.86910556854.27bp0.99000013PARTIAL
SELL$1.00K0.1042411981.49bp0.1000003FILLED
SELL$10.00K0.0362407212.34bp0.01000011PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.0362407212.34bp0.01000011PARTIAL

Risk metrics

sovereign store · 368 barsperiods/year ≈ 1.75M
Realized vol (annualised)
636.19%
σ per bar = 0.004805
Mean return (annualised)
58565.25%
μ per bar = 0.000334
Sharpe (rf=0)
92.06
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
0.00%
peak 0.12 → trough 0.12 over 0 bars

/api/asset/pm-wta-sun-kalinin-2026-06-13/risk · same metrics, JSON