POLYMARKET · PREDICTION MARKET · WILL RUSSIA CAPTURE ALL OF KUPIANSK BY...?

Will Russia capture all of Kupiansk by June 30?

YES · live
1.8¢
NO · live
98.2¢

▸ Advanced metrics · M2M bundle

polymarket · will-russia-capture-all-of-kupiansk-by-june-30 · fresh · feed 0s old
realized vol (ann.)
max drawdown
sharpe
ulcer index
RMS drawdown
pain index
mean drawdown
mod. VaR 95%
Cornish-Fisher
martin ratio
ret / ulcer
CDaR 95%
cond. drawdown
gain/pain
Σgain / Σ|loss|
sterling
ret / CDaR
omega (θ=0)
upside/downside
roll spread
implied (price-only)
bars used
0
insufficient
spread
24h Δ
flow lean
carry
flat
signalNEUTRALconfidence 0%
  • insufficient history for risk metrics — directional read only
Same bundle via M2M API: /api/m2m/pm-will-russia-capture-all-of-kupiansk-by-june-30/bundle · venue execution: polymarket
LIVEPOLL0SRCFRESH2ms--:--:-- UTC8NEXT8.0sUP0s--:--HIST0/30
▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·▶ STREAMING·HYPERLIQUID·POLYMARKET·0 POLLS·SRC FRESH·UPTIME 0s·NEXT POLL 8.0s·CC0 OPEN DATA·HYPO.MARKETS·
YES · live
1.8¢
NO · live
98.2¢
YES price · live 24h
n=25 · μ=0.0314 · σ=0.0089 · range [0.0180, 0.0605] · R²=0.286 FALLING -44.62%σ EXTREME 28.37%LAST 0.01800.06050.04990.03930.02860.0180μ = 0.0314max 0.0605min 0.0180dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.29μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxminlive endpoint
25 ticks · last 1.80¢
YES / NO split · live
YES 1.8%NO 98.2%NO98.2%98.20¢ · odds 1/1.02
Σ 100.00% · fair
Σ-sides total = 100.00% (tight rounding)
H(p) entropy = 0.130 / 1.00 bits (13%) · informative — one side favoured
YES
1.8%1.8¢55.56× +0.00pp
NO
98.2%98.2¢1.02× +0.00pp
Σ 100.00% · arb gap 0.00pp
Per-tick activity · |Δp| in basis points · live
n=24 · Σ=875 · μ=36.5 · σ=68.4 · CV=1.88BURSTY · concentratedcumulative energy ↗ · 50% by h=14070140210280μ = 3628050%h1h5h9h13h17h21#1 peak#2-3> μactivequietμ linecum energy
Σ 875bp moved · peak 280bp · n=24 ticks
Live numerics · pulse on poll
LIVE NUMERICS8 metrics·POLL 0
snapshot age
2ms
YES mid
1.80¢ (1.80%)
NO mid
98.20¢ (98.20%)
ΣΣ sides
100.00%
arb gap
0.000pp
$24h vol $
$178.7k
liquidity $
$10.9k
history points
25 ticks (live)

§1 · 24h price history (YES + NO tokens)

YES price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.0314 · σ=0.0089 · range [0.0180, 0.0605] · R²=0.286 FALLING -44.62%σ EXTREME 28.37%LAST 0.01800.06050.04990.03930.02860.0180μ = 0.0314max 0.0605min 0.0180dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.29μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 YES observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 1.80¢
NO price · CLOB mid
n=25 · μ=0.9686 · σ=0.0089 · range [0.9395, 0.9820] · R²=0.286 RISING +1.50%σ LOW 0.92%LAST 0.98200.98200.97140.96070.95010.9395μ = 0.9686max 0.9820min 0.9395dataMA(5)OLS R²=0.29μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
25 NO observations from clob.polymarket.com · last 98.20¢

§2 · Distribution of Δp

Histogram of hourly increments
n=24 · 10 bins · μ=-0.0008 · σ=0.0069 · skew=-0.99 (left-skewed) · kurt=6.77 (leptokurtic (fat tails))16128401-2.55ppbin -2.55pp · n=1 · 6.3% peakbin -2.55pp · n=1 · 6.3% peak-2.06pp-1.57pp-1.08pp2-0.59ppbin -0.59pp · n=2 · 12.5% peakbin -0.59pp · n=2 · 12.5% peak16-0.10ppbin -0.10pp · n=16 · 100.0% peakbin -0.10pp · n=16 · 100.0% peak40.38ppbin 0.38pp · n=4 · 25.0% peakbin 0.38pp · n=4 · 25.0% peak0.88pp1.37pp11.86ppbin 1.86pp · n=1 · 6.3% peakbin 1.86pp · n=1 · 6.3% peakμΔ < 0 · loss barsΔ ≈ 0 · flatΔ > 0 · gain barsN(μ,σ²) referenceμ line · ±σ band shaded
n=24
Q-Q plot · standardised Δp vs N(0,1)
n=24 · skew=-1.01 · kurt=6.82 · near 7 / mid 16 / far 1 · OLS slope=0.84 intercept=-0.00LEPTOKURTIC — FAT TAILSUPPER TAIL NORMALLOWER TAIL NORMAL-3σ-3σ-2σ-2σ-1σ-1σ+0σ+0σ+1σ+1σ+2σ+2σ+3σ+3σΔ=-1.57σsample ↓marginal: sample bars + theoretical N(0,1) curve →theoretical Φ⁻¹(p) →↑ sample z-quantile|Δ| < 0.3σ · on the line|Δ| < 1σ · moderate|Δ| ≥ 1σ · outliery = x refOLS fit
reference line = identity (perfect normality). Heavy upper-right tail = fat positive tail.

§3 · Sample moments

Descriptive statistics · 5-number summary · shape diagnostics
SAMPLE MOMENTS · N=25LEPTOKURTIC · FAT TAILS (G₂=2.47)
μ MEAN3.14¢95% CI: [2.79¢, 3.48¢]
σ STD DEV0.89ppσ² = 0.791 · CV = 28.37%
med MEDIAN3.30¢Q₁ 2.90¢ · Q₃ 3.40¢
FIVE-NUMBER SUMMARY · BOX PLOT
min 1.80¢Q₁ 2.90¢med 3.30¢Q₃ 3.40¢max 6.05¢μ
SKEWNESS · G₁0.894right-skewed
−3−10+1+3
EXCESS KURTOSIS · G₂2.469leptokurtic · fat tails
−30+2+4+6
μ ↔ medianμ < med · left-tailed|μ−med| / σ = 0.18
σ × 1.349 ↔ IQRdiverges from normalratio = 2.40
range ↔ σwide tails (range > 4σ)range / σ = 4.78
μ = mean YES probability · σ = standard deviation · 95% CI = μ ± 1.96·SE. Skew/kurt diagnose departure from normality.

§5 · Time-series structure

Regime & autocorrelation diagnostics
TIME-SERIES STRUCTUREREGIME: MEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.34 + ADF rejected
ρ(1) AUTOCORR-0.341within white-noise band
ρ(2) AUTOCORR-0.107lag-2 not significant
H · HURST EXPONENT0.750strongly persistent
OLS TREND · t-STAT-3.039significant @ α=0.05
HURST EXPONENT [0, 1]
H = 0.750STRONGLY PERSISTENT
0
anti-persistent
0.45
mean-reverting
0.5
random walk
0.55
persistent
1
strongly trending
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION · ρ(k) for k=1..5
k=1-0.341k=2-0.107k=3+0.031k=4+0.155k=5-0.1530+1−1+0.410.41+ momentum (ρ > +0.41)− reversal (ρ < −0.41)noise (within band)±2/√n threshold
OLS TREND · t-STAT · [-5, +5]
−5 reject−1.960 retain H₀+1.96+5 reject
REGIME CLASSIFICATIONMEAN-REVERTING · ρ(1) -0.34 + ADF rejectedfrom Hurst + ρ(1) joint diagnosis
PREDICTABILITY · score 0.84very high · strong structure|ρ(1)| + 2·|H − 0.5| heuristic
TREND SIGNIFICANCESIGNIFICANT @ 1% (|t|=3.04)α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96 · α=0.01 |t|=2.58
ρ(k) = lag-k sample autocorrelation · H = R/S Hurst exponent · t = OLS-trend t-statistic. Significance bands at ±2/√n approximate the 95% white-noise envelope. α=0.05 critical |t|=1.96; α=0.01 |t|=2.58.

§6 · Microstructure

Market quality · two-sided pricing · activity
MICROSTRUCTURE · MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%
MARKET ID1386901
SLUGwill-russia-capture-all-of-kupiansk-by-june-30
CATEGORYWill Russia capture all of Kupiansk by...?
TWO-SIDED PRICING
PRIMARY · YES1.80¢implied prob 1.80% · decimal odds 55.56×
COUNTER · NO98.20¢implied prob 98.20% · decimal odds 1.02×
1.80¢
98.20¢
Σ-SIDES ARBITRAGE TEST
0%50%100% · target110%
Σ = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.000pp
24H ACTIVITY · LIQUIDITY
24H VOLUME178.67k USD 24h
LIQUIDITY10.89k USD
MARKET QUALITYPERFECT · ARB-FREE Σ=100.00%|1−Σ| ≤ 0.5pp ⇒ fair · > 2pp ⇒ inefficient
PRICING SKEWFAVOURS NO (98¢)|primary − counter| = 0.964 · entropy 0.130 bits
LIQUIDITY DEPTHDEEP100k+ deep · 10k+ active · 1k+ modest · 100+ thin
Σ-sides = YES + NO implied probabilities. Perfect arb-free Σ = 100%. |1−Σ| > 2pp suggests synthetic outright arbitrage.

§7 · Position sizing & edge analysis

Probability split · YES vs NO · Kelly · entropy · arbitrage
FAIR MARKET · no edge
YES 1.8%NO 98.2%YES1.8%H = 0.130 / 1.00 bits
Probability scale (YES)
0%25%50%
fair
75%100%
Implied decimal odds
YES55.56×(2¢)NO1.02×(98¢)
Kelly bet-size (% of bankroll) K* = 0.00%
K* full
0.00%
½K half
0.00%
¼K quarter
0.00%
Entropy H(p̂) = 0.130 bits (13% of max) · informative — one side strongly favoured
0 (certain)0.250.50.751.00 (max)
Σ-sides = 100.00% · |1 − Σ| = 0.00pp · tight cross-venue rounding
K* full = (b·p − q)/b · ½K and ¼K are conservative fractions of the full-Kelly bet. Entropy in bits — log₂(2)=1 is maximum uncertainty for a binary market.

§8 · Time decay & θ projection

Time decay & theta projection
⏱ URGENCY · DISTANTresolves 2026-06-30 00:00 UTC
15days
04hrs
48min
YES$1.00(P = 1.8%)
NO$0.00(P = 98.2%)
current: $0.0180 · expected return per side: $0.98 on YES hit · $0.02 on NO hit
0%25%50%75%100%YES $1NO $0NOW+7.6dRESOLVESP projection · σ=0.89% · path funnel to settle at YES=1 or NO=0
Theta progression · θ ∝ σ / √t_remainingθ_now = 4.358 pp/day
now15.20d left
4.358 pp/day×1.00
−25%11.40d left
5.032 pp/day×1.15
−50%7.60d left
6.163 pp/day×1.41
−75%3.80d left
8.716 pp/day×2.00
−90%1.52d left
13.781 pp/day×3.16
θ approximation: σ/√T (expected daily move magnitude). The cone shows ±√(p̂(1−p̂)) widening as time decays, funneling to {0, 1} at resolution. Theta accelerates as √(t_left)→0.

§9 · Hourly return heatmap

24-hour signed Δp grid · green = up · red = down
HOURLY RETURN HEATMAP · n=24 bars · best 2.10% · worst -2.80% · typical |Δ| 0.36%BEARISH SESSION -1.45%BEST+2.10%14hWORST-2.80%15hTYPICAL |Δ|0.36%mean absoluteCUMULATIVE-1.45%Σ signed ΔSTREAK▬ 0flat-runASIA · 00-08 UTCμ +0.02% · Σ +0.15%EUROPE · 08-16 UTCμ -0.02% · Σ -0.15%US · 16-24 UTCμ -0.18% · Σ -1.45%CUMULATIVE Δ PATH · final -1.45%+2.80%-1.45%0.15% · 1h0.15% · 1h0.15%1h0.00% · 2h0.00% · 2h·2h0.55% · 3h0.55% · 3h0.55%3h-0.65% · 4h-0.65% · 4h-0.65%4h0.00% · 5h0.00% · 5h·5h0.00% · 6h0.00% · 6h·6h0.10% · 7h0.10% · 7h0.10%7h-0.10% · 8h-0.10% · 8h-0.10%8h0.00% · 9h0.00% · 9h·9h0.15% · 10h0.15% · 10h0.15%10h-0.05% · 11h-0.05% · 11h-0.05%11h0.10% · 12h0.10% · 12h0.10%12h0.45% · 13h0.45% · 13h0.45%13h2.10% · 14h2.10% · 14h2.10%14h★ BEST-2.80% · 15h-2.80% · 15h-2.80%15h▼ WORST-0.15% · 16h-0.15% · 16h-0.15%16h0.05% · 17h0.05% · 17h0.05%17h-0.25% · 18h-0.25% · 18h-0.25%18h-0.75% · 19h-0.75% · 19h-0.75%19h-0.05% · 20h-0.05% · 20h-0.05%20h-0.05% · 21h-0.05% · 21h-0.05%21h-0.20% · 22h-0.20% · 22h-0.20%22h-0.05% · 23h-0.05% · 23h-0.05%23h0.00% · 24h0.00% · 24h·24hTIME PATTERNAsia-led (+0.15%)RUNSup max 3 · down max 6BREADTH33% up · 46% down · 21% flat
8 up bars · 11 down · best 2.10% · worst -2.80% · typical |Δ| 0.365%

§10 · Equity curve & underwater drawdown

Cumulative compounded return + running peak-to-trough
EQUITY & DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS · n=25 barsLOSS WITH MODERATE DD (-1.51%)FINAL-1.51%MAX DD-4.20%RECOVERYONGOING · 10 barsMAX RUN-UP+2.81%UNDERWATER20/25 (80%)STREAK▬ 0EQUITY CURVE · end 0.9849 · peak 1.0281 · range [0.9849, 1.0281]1.02810.9849break-even = 1★ PEAK 1.0281UNDERWATER DRAWDOWN · max -4.20% · moderate0%-4.20%▼ TROUGH -4.20%TOP DRAWDOWN PERIODS · 2 total#1 -4.20%bar 16-25 · 10 bars · ONGOING#2 -0.65%bar 5-14 · 10 bars · recoveredDD SEVERITYmoderate (max -4.20%)RECOVERYongoing · 10 barsTIME UNDER WATER80% of session · 20/25 bars
final equity 0.9849 (-1.51%) · max DD -4.20% · time-under-water 20/25 bars

§11 · Rolling-window statistics (w = 6 bars)

Rolling annualised Sharpe ratio · green positive · red negative
n=19 · +6 / −12 (32% positive) · μ=-11.91 · σ=38.97UNPROFITABLE STRATEGYLAST -60.04 (-1.24σ vs μ)77.5438.770.00-38.77-77.54μ = -11.912.022.020.000.00-4.05-4.05-37.17-37.1726.5826.5816.7616.7631.7331.7343.2143.2152.1252.12-0.49-0.49-3.46-3.46-2.47-2.47-5.92-5.92-17.86-17.86-56.76-56.76-64.97-64.97-67.92-67.92-77.54-77.54-60.04-60.04v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -60.044 · range [-77.54, 52.12] · μ -11.908 · positive Sharpe = excess-return-per-risk earned by buying-and-holding through this window
Rolling annualised volatility (%)
n=19 · μ=63.2437 · σ=56.4191 · range [8.2395, 147.9100] · R²=0.073 FALLING -26.07%σ EXTREME 89.21%LAST 26.7470147.9100112.992478.074843.15728.2395μ = 63.2437max 147.9100min 8.2395dataMA(3)OLS R²=0.07μ lineμ ± σ bandmaxmin
latest 26.75% · range [8.24%, 147.91%] · μ 63.24% · σ̂ scaled to annualised (×√8760)
Rolling lag-1 autocorrelation ρ(1)
n=19 · +2 / −17 (11% positive) · μ=-0.267 · σ=0.209MEAN-REVERSIONLAST -0.093 (+0.83σ vs μ)0.5120.2560.000-0.256-0.512μ = -0.267-0.478-0.478-0.486-0.486-0.507-0.507-0.058-0.058-0.274-0.274-0.468-0.468-0.489-0.4890.0290.0290.1390.139-0.391-0.391-0.360-0.360-0.360-0.360-0.371-0.371-0.512-0.512-0.090-0.090-0.078-0.078-0.115-0.115-0.107-0.107-0.093-0.093v > 0 · positivev < 0 · negativeμ mean lineμ ± σ bandlatest bar (outlined)
latest -0.093 · |ρ| > 0.3 ⇒ regime with persistence (ρ > 0) or reversal (ρ < 0) · |ρ| ≤ 0.1 = consistent with random walk

§12 · Hypothesis tests (α = 0.05)

Formal inference at 5% significance
1 of 6 REJECT · mixed evidence1 reject·5 pass·α = 0.05
𝒩

Jarque-Bera

REJECT H₀***

H₀: Δp ~ Normal(μ, σ²)

STATISTIC
81.9025
p-VALUE (log scale)
< 0.0001
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p < α · rejection zonenon-normal · fat tails or skew present
ρ

Ljung-Box(h=5)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: No serial autocorrelation up to lag 5

STATISTIC
5.0194
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.4141
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedconsistent with white noise
Ψ

Dickey-Fuller (τ_μ)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p has a unit root (non-stationary)

STATISTIC
-1.9860
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.3019
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedrandom-walk behaviour (crit ≈ -2.86)
±

Wald-Wolfowitz runs

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Sign sequence of Δ is random

STATISTIC
-0.1276
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.8985
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedsigns appear random (10 runs)
χ

KPSS (μ stationarity)

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: p IS level-stationary

STATISTIC
0.4371
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.0612
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedstationary not rejected (crit 0.463)
χ

Variance ratio q=3

FAIL TO REJECTns

H₀: Δp is a random walk · VR = 1

STATISTIC
-1.5909
p-VALUE (log scale)
0.1116
α
10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹1
p ≥ α · null retainedVR 0.516 ≈ 1 (RW behaviour)
Each row states an explicit null H₀, the test statistic, an approximated p-value, and the decision. REJECT means evidence against H₀. KPSS complements ADF (rejecting both ⇒ ambiguous; rejecting one ⇒ clean verdict).

§13 · Spectral analysis (DFT periodogram)

Power spectrum of Δp · ‖X̂(k)‖²/n
n=12 bins · noise floor μ=5.97e-5 · top T=2.18h (20.8%) · top-3 cover 50.6%2 SIGNIFICANT CYCLEScumulative energy ↗ (2 bins above 2× noise)1.5e-41.1e-47.5e-53.7e-50.0e+0μ noise floor2× noise (significance)period 24.0 · power 1.83e-5 · 2.6% energyperiod 24.0 · power 1.83e-5 · 2.6% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.29e-5 · 4.6% energyperiod 12.0 · power 3.29e-5 · 4.6% energyperiod 8.0 · power 1.07e-5 · 1.5% energyperiod 8.0 · power 1.07e-5 · 1.5% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.45e-5 · 4.8% energyperiod 6.0 · power 3.45e-5 · 4.8% energyperiod 4.8 · power 3.81e-5 · 5.3% energyperiod 4.8 · power 3.81e-5 · 5.3% energyperiod 4.0 · power 8.33e-5 · 11.6% energyperiod 4.0 · power 8.33e-5 · 11.6% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.30e-4 · 18.2% energyperiod 3.4 · power 1.30e-4 · 18.2% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.08e-5 · 8.5% energyperiod 3.0 · power 6.08e-5 · 8.5% energyperiod 2.7 · power 7.61e-5 · 10.6% energyperiod 2.7 · power 7.61e-5 · 10.6% energyperiod 2.4 · power 3.60e-5 · 5.0% energyperiod 2.4 · power 3.60e-5 · 5.0% energyperiod 2.2 · power 1.49e-4 · 20.8% energyperiod 2.2 · power 1.49e-4 · 20.8% energyperiod 2.0 · power 4.68e-5 · 6.5% energyperiod 2.0 · power 4.68e-5 · 6.5% energy50% by T=3.0h#1 dominantT=2.18h#2T=3.43h#3T=4.00hT=2hT=3hT=4hT=6hT=8hT=12hT=16hT=24h← shorter cycle (high freq · Nyquist=½) · period T (bars per cycle) · longer cycle (low freq · 1/n) →#1 dominant#2 peak#3 peak> 2× noisenoiseμ floor2μ sig.cum energy
dominant period ≈ 2.18h (freq 0.458) · concentrates 20.8% of total energy · Σ|X̂|²/n = 7.166e-4

§14 · Honest position analytics

A binary-market analytics module framed in horizon time (days to resolution, not annualised). Estimators that need a model probability q as a first-class input (Kelly, KL divergence, Bayesian posterior, Mark-to-Market MC) only render when q is provided externally. Sweep an exploratory q at the interactive simulator →

§15 · Horizon returns

Returns · per bar / per day / per horizon
Horizon 15.2 d · σ/bar 0.776pp · expected |Δp| over horizon 14.83ppterminal variance p(1−p) = 0.0177 · n = 25low confidence · n < 100
μ per bar
-0.060pp
average Δp · drift
σ per bar
0.776pp
one-bar volatility · logit-free
Per-day movedaily
3.80pp
σ × √24
Per-horizon move15d
14.83pp
σ × √364.81356055555557
Terminal variancebinary
0.0177
p(1−p) at resolution
Current pricep
1.8¢
latest snapshot
Note: annualised Sharpe/Sortino are omitted — they are not meaningful for a bounded fixed-horizon binary contract that snaps to {0, 1} at resolution.
Annualised metrics are intentionally omitted — they don't apply to bounded probability series that resolve at a fixed date.

§16 · Tail risk

VaR · ES · max drawdown
VaR₉₅ 0.67pp · ES₉₅ 1.71pp · method empirical · drift-correcteddrift -0.060pp/bar · quantised: no · median step 0.10pp · unique ratio 0.60disabled · n < 30
VaR 95%
0.67pp
5th percentile of Δp
ES 95%
1.71pp
mean of the tail
Max drawdown
70.2pp
peak 6.0¢ → trough 1.8¢
Median step
0.10pp
price bucket granularity
Empirical quantiles unless the price series is bucketed (PM cent grid), in which case parametric N(0, σ²) is used to avoid grid collapse.

§17 · Odds conversion

Odds conversion · every dialect a bettor thinks in
Implied probabilityP
1.8%
= price
Decimal oddsEU
55.556
total return per $1
AmericanUS
+5456
$100 wins $5456
FractionalUK
54.56 / 1
profit per $1 risked
Profit per $100stake
+$5455.56
clean dollar framing
-1000-5000+500+1000020406080100you · 1.8%implied probability (%)American odds
underdog (+)favorite (-)your price
Price → implied probability → decimal odds → American moneyline → fractional. Five views of the same number, plus the moneyline curve.

§18 · Binary entropy

Binary entropy · uncertainty as bits of information
Market entropyH(p)
0.130 bit
max 1.0 at p = 0.5
Your entropyH(q)
0.130 bit
Δ +0.000 bit vs market
Surprise · YES−log₂ p
5.80 bit
self-information
Surprise · NO−log₂(1−p)
0.03 bit
self-information
0.000.260.530.791.050.00.20.40.60.81.0marketmodelprobabilityH (bits)
Market entropy only — model entropy requires an external q.

§19 · Model-dependent surfaces

§ Edge / Kelly / KL · no model probability provided

External model required

The position-economics, Kelly, KL-divergence, Bayesian and Monte-Carlo surfaces require a model probability q as input — a number independent of the market price p.

The previous build defaulted q to a tape-momentum heuristic derived from p; that produces apparent edge that is structurally guaranteed to be small and is not a useful skill signal. The auto-derived path has been removed.

To explore these surfaces with a hypothetical q, open the interactive simulator and drag the MODEL P(YES) slider. To wire a real model, POST to the NOSTRADAMUS hook (TBD) or pass ?q=… on the simulator URL.

§∞ · Provenance & attestation

Upstream (snapshot)
gamma-api.polymarket.com
Upstream (history)
clob.polymarket.com
YES token ID
41047177216657440229049612343054867251080323008605626957900347239908606990372
NO token ID
79840766020796864893745195538410415702405199356747741841153255370695185707583
Snapshot fetched
2026-06-14 19:11:11 UTC
Snapshot age
2ms
History points
25 CLOB mids
Page rendered
2026-06-14 19:11:11 UTC
Storage policy
no persistence — fetched on every request
SHA-256 attestation
4ebe13c178eb4a35d3d02c511c40d73ac5d51c3e07d16b6d2bbc103b111af757 · deterministic hash of source snapshot
Open data licence
CC0 / public domain

§∞-2 · Related markets · explore more

Also see: /arb opportunities · RSS feed · more in Will Russia capture all of Kupiansk by...?

Market depth

live order book · Polymarket YES
Depth within 1bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 5bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 10bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Depth within 50bp
$0
bid $0 · ask $0
Mid price
0.018000
(best bid + best ask) / 2
Spread
1111.1bp
(bestAsk − bestBid) / mid
Imbalance (whole book)
+0.102
bid-heavy
Imbalance (top-5)
+0.319
bid-heavy top-of-book

Slippage scenarios

live book walk · Polymarket YES

Simulating a market order at three notionals against the live book. Slippage = avg execution price vs. mid, in basis points. Worst fill = price of the deepest level touched. Live JSON: /api/asset/pm-will-russia-capture-all-of-kupiansk-by-june-30/slippage?size=10000&side=buy

SideNotionalAvg fillSlippageWorst fillLevelsStatus
BUY$1.00K0.16949084161.07bp0.57100028FILLED
BUY$10.00K0.542531291405.85bp0.78000036FILLED
BUY$100.00K0.848082461156.94bp0.99900054PARTIAL
SELL$1.00K0.0030898283.86bp0.00100014PARTIAL
SELL$10.00K0.0030898283.86bp0.00100014PARTIAL
SELL$100.00K0.0030898283.86bp0.00100014PARTIAL

Risk metrics

upstream candles · 25 bars
Realized vol (annualised)
σ per bar = 0.179485
Mean return (annualised)
μ per bar = -0.024620
Sharpe (rf=0)
annualised; risk-free assumed zero
Max drawdown
70.25%
peak 0.06 → trough 0.02 over 9 bars

/api/asset/pm-will-russia-capture-all-of-kupiansk-by-june-30/risk · same metrics, JSON